Legal Opinion

Hust v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 10, 1946No. 625Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

328 U.S. 707 (1946)

HUST

v.

MOORE-McCORMACK LINES, INC.

No. 625.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued April 22, 29, 1946.

Decided June 10, 1946.

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.

Abraham E. Freedman and B.A. Green argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief was Edwin D. Hicks.

Erskine Wood and Erskine B. Wood argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

Briefs were filed as amici curiae by William L. Standard and Jacquin Frank for the National Maritime Union of America; by Silas B. Axtell and Myron Scott for Josephine Fontao et al.; and by Abraham E. Freedman, Milton M.…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Rutledge; Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Warner v. GoltraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API