Davis v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco sustaining a demurrer to a sixth amended complaint and refusing leave to file a seventh. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
This appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer to the sixth amended complaint and directing judgment to be entered for the defendant, and from an order refusing to allow a seventh amended complaint to be filed. For convenience, unless otherwise indicated, we shall refer to the sixth amended complaint as the complaint, and to the seventh as the amended complaint and to the first complaint filed as the original complaint and to respondent as the bank.
Appellants claim that practically the samé question is presented for decision in both appeals and their argument is addressed largely to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Truett v. OnderdonkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Flood v. TempletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Merck & Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Kerrigan v. O'MearaMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- Mobley v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 1983
- Allen v. RamsayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Frisbee v. CoburnMontana Supreme Court · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.