Bettis v. Cargile
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Jefferson County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge. Action by J. H. Bettis against A. C. Cargile. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
AMES, C.
The motion to dismiss the appeal in this case must be sustained. The case is brought here by case- made, and not by transcript. When the judgment of the trial court was entered against the plaintiff in error, no extension of time was secured by him within which to serve his case-made. Section 6074, Comp. Laws 1909, provides that the case-made shall be served within three days after the judgment is entered, and section 6075 authorizes the court or judge to extend the time for good cause. Here the case-made was not served within three days, nor was any order extending the time…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bettis v. CargileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Devault v. Merchants' Exch. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Finch v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Martin v. GassertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Stinchcomb v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Martin v. MilnorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Jordon v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Murray v. BristowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Jordon v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Jordon v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913