Legal Opinion

Stinchcomb v. Myers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 10, 1911No. 634PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error from, District Court, Oklahoma, County; George W. Clark, Judge. Action by John H. Myers against L. Stinchcomb and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action to recover upon certain promissory notes. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and there was a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $900. The case is here upon the petition in error of plaintiffs in error and a cross-petition in error by the defendant in error.

It appears from the record that no motion for a new' trial was filed. As the only errors assigned in the petition in error and cross-petition are matters relating to errors of law alleged to have occurred at the trial they cannot lie reviewed in the Supreme Court. It has long been the settled…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Glaser v. GlaserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  2. Beall v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  3. Bradford v. BrennanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. O'Neil v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Ledgerwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Avery v. HaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Crump v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API