Legal Opinion

McKelvey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 30, 1993No. CR 90-924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AFTER REMAND

In an unpublished memorandum, this Court affirmed the appellant's convictions for third degree burglary and first degree theft. McKelvey v. State, 595 So.2d 922 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991) (table). On certiorari review, the Alabama Supreme Court held that McKelvey could raise for the first time on direct appeal his claim that he was improperly sentenced. Exparte McKelvey, 630 So.2d 56 (Ala. 1992). On remand, this Court, in response to the directions of the Supreme Court, found that "the appellant's convictions for burglary and theft arose from the same 'act or omission' within the meaning…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. Ex Parte MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Wildman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rolling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  2. Dawson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  3. Dozier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. Knotts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API