Legal Opinion

Dixon v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 16, 1991No. 1900347PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted certiorari review in this case in order to determine whether probable cause for arrest existed.

Dana Lamark Dixon pleaded guilty to first degree burglary and first degree rape while reserving his right to appeal from the trial court's denial of a motion to suppress. The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction, holding that there was no probable cause for arrest, and, therefore, that the motion to suppress should have been granted. 588 So.2d 891. We reverse and remand.

The facts are as follows: Officer Echols of the Montgomery Police Department was on routine patrol on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Ex Parte BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Seawright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Hyde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  2. Melson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  3. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  4. Whitehead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  5. Couch v. City of SheffieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API