Legal Opinion

Dehnert v. Arrow Sprinklers, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1985No. 84-142PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

Architect Eugene F. Dehnert and the architectural firm of Dehnert, Richardson and Bensman appeal from the judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding $400,-000 in compensatory damages to appellee Arrow Sprinklers, Inc., upon its claim that appellants intentionally interfered with its landscaping and irrigation contract with Fremont County School District No. 1. We will hold that the evidence was insufficient to establish that appellants acted without justification in recommending that the school board terminate appellee’s contract, and will, therefore, reverse the judgment of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lundgren v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Kvenild v. TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. True v. Hi-Plains Elevator MacHinery, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. v. HolsoWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Kecko Piping Co. v. Town of MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Century Ready-Mix Co. v. Campbell County School DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Four Nines Gold, Inc. v. 71 Const., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Dan Nelson Construction, Inc. v. Nodland & DicksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Young v. WEST COAST INDUST. RELATIONS ASS'N, INC.District Court, D. Delaware · 1991
  5. Wyoming Sawmills, Inc. v. MorrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API