Legal Opinion

Dierman v. Providence Hospital

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1947No. S. F. 17573Published

1Opinion of the Court

31 Cal.2d 290 (1947)

MABEL DIERMAN, Appellant,

v.

PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL (a Corporation) et al., Respondents.

S. F. No. 17573.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Dec. 30, 1947.

Gladstein, Andersen, Resner, Sawyer & Edises, Geo. R. Andersen and Gladstein, Andersen, Resner & Sawyer for Appellant.

Hoge, Pelton & Gunther, Franklin C. Latcham, Johnson, Ricksen & Johnson, Johnson & Ricksen and Stanley C. Smallwood for Respondents.

SCHAUER, J.

This is an action for personal injuries allegedly caused by the negligence of defendants. Plaintiff entered defendant hospital for the purpose of having a wart on her…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Dierman v. Providence HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Druzanich v. CrileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Hinds v. WheadonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API