Legal Opinion

Cutler v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1935No. Appeal, 276PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Appellant sought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by her through the negligence of defendant while a passenger in a trolley car of defendant company. After verdict found for plaintiff by the jury the court granted defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. Plaintiff appealed.

An examination of the record discloses no evidence sufficient to charge defendant with negligence. Plaintiff testified that, as she arose to leave the car, two violent jerks in succession threw her first forward and then backward against the seat and resulted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith Et Ux. v. Pittsburghi Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Endicott v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Hody Et Ux. v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Izzi v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Staller v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Cook v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Miller v. Delaware County Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Waldov v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API