Legal Opinion

Perlman v. First Nat'l Bank of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1975No. 46531PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case the court has been unable to reach a decision because two judges have recused themselves and the remaining members of the court are divided so that it is impossible to secure the concurrence of four judges which is required by section 3 of article VI of the Constitution.

The court has carefully considered, in this case and in other cases, the appropriate method of resolving the problem that occurs when individual judges are disqualified and a constitutional majority of four cannot be mustered for any opinion. No solution is wholly free from objection. The court has decided,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In the Matter of Pubs, Inc. Of Champaign, Bankrupt. Appeal of Bank of Illinois in Champaign, ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  3. Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  4. Chultem v. Ticor Title Ins. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Denton Enterprises, Inc. v. Illinois State Toll Highway AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API