Legal Opinion

Gunn v. Reliance Standard Life Ins.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 15, 2007No. Nos. 05-56900, 06-55077PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Igor Gunn (“Gunn”), the beneficiary, brought action against Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co. (“Reliance”), the plan administrator, after he was denied benefits under a long-term disability insurance policy that was subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

The district court, in a published decision, held that Gunn was entitled to long-term disability payments. Gunn v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., 399 F.Supp.2d 1095 (C.D.Cal.2005). The district court also awarded Gunn his attorney’s fees. Gunn v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., 407 F.Supp.2d 1162…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Richard Atwood v. Newmont Gold Co., Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Gunn v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
  4. Gunn v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gunn v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API