Legal Opinion
Gunn v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 31, 2005No. CV 04-01852 FMC(MANx)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
COOPER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on administrative review. The Court has reviewed the parties’ briefs and the administrative record. As explained herein, the Court reviews the administrative decision de novo and concludes that Plaintiff is entitled to benefits under the Plan.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff appeals the defendant insurer’s termination of long-term disability benefits.
II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 2001, Plaintiff Igor Gunn (“Gunn”) was employed by UBS/Paine Webber (“PW”) as a financial advisor. At the time, PW participated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health LabCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Martin Hansen, Cross-Appellee v. The Continental Insurance Company and Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Neil Bergt v. The Retirement Plan for Pilots Employed by Markair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Barnes v. Independent Automobile Dealers Ass'n of California Health & Welfare Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gunn v. Reliance Standard Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007