Legal Opinion
Gunn v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 4, 2006No. CV 04-01852 FMC MANXPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES
COOPER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees (docket # 63). The Court has read and considered the moving, opposition, and reply documents submitted in connection with this Motion. The Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. Accordingly, the hearing set for January 9, 2006, is removed from the Court’s calendar.
In an order dated October 31, 2005, the Court, on administrative review, found that Plaintiff was entitled to benefits under the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Don Ray Smith v. Cmta-Iam Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Salvatore D'EmanuElE v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., Long Term Disability Plan & Trust Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gunn v. Reliance Standard Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007