Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hazen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 10, 1938No. 28001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
This action was commenced by the plaintiff to recover on an insurance policy issued by the defendant for the benefit of the plaintiff, who was one of the employees of the city of Ponca City. At the time of the accident plaintiff was a policeman on the police force of said city, and while so employed suffered a sunstroke and as a result is totally and permanently disabled.
The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff sustained an accidental injury within the meaning of the terms of the policy as announced by this court in adopting and approving the rule in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Van Vechten v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Eastern District Piece Dye Works, Inc. v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Zinn v. Equitable Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Suggs v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Raley v. Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of TennesseeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
- Paul Revere Life Ins. v. StanfieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
- Jacobson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.