Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Resto v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 9, 1997Published

1Concurrence

Goldstein, J.,

concurs in part and dissents in part, and votes to dismiss the appeal from the provision of the order which is against the Board of Education of the City of New York, and to affirm the order insofar as reviewed, with the following memorandum, with which Miller, J., concurs: The key factors in determining whether to permit service of a late notice of claim are whether the claimant has demonstrated a reasonable excuse for failing to serve a timely notice of claim, whether the *502municipal defendant acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within 90 days…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Perry v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Buddenhagen v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. ALOUETTE FASHIONS, INC. v. Consol. Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Sosa v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Alouette Fashions, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API