Doe v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, District Judge.
■ Jane Doe (“Doe”) is suing Environmental Auto Removal, Inc. (“EAR”) and one of its employees, Joseph Pantalena (“Pantale-na”), over events related to Doe’s arrest for disorderly conduct at the City of Chicago auto pound (“the pound”). 1 In count I of her six-count complaint, Doe alleges that Pantalena violated 42 U.S.C. § 1983 when he deprived her of her right to be free from unlawful seizure. In count II, Doe claims that her arrest and subsequent criminal proceedings constituted a malicious prosecution by Pantalena, also in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schmidt v. City of Lockport, Ill.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- Flores v. East Chicago City ofDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
- Walker v. City Of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022