Monroe v. City of Fort Howard
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEALS from the Circuit Court for Bo-own Comity.
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, C. J.
These are actions in equity to restrain the collection of a tax • for reasons affecting the groundwork of the tax, and coming within section 12105, R. S. The court below proceeded to judgment for the respondents, without awaiting a reassessment; and it is very properly conceded, by their learned counsel, that the cases are governed by Plumer v. Supervisors, 46 Wis., 163; Flanders v. Merrimack, 48 Wis., 567; Kingsley v. Supervisors, 49 Wis., 649; and Single v. Stettin, id., 645, and must be reversed.
This is perhaps a proper place to remark that the opinion of the court in Kingsley v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Flanders v. Town of MerrimackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- In re PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
- Plumer v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Kingsley v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Southmayd v. Watertown Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sloane v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Gilbert-Arnold Land Co. v. O'HareWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Johnston v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Voelz v. VoelzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Clarke v. Lincoln CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.