Legal Opinion

Monroe v. City of Fort Howard

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1880PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEALS from the Circuit Court for Bo-own Comity.

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, C. J.

These are actions in equity to restrain the collection of a tax • for reasons affecting the groundwork of the tax, and coming within section 12105, R. S. The court below proceeded to judgment for the respondents, without awaiting a reassessment; and it is very properly conceded, by their learned counsel, that the cases are governed by Plumer v. Supervisors, 46 Wis., 163; Flanders v. Merrimack, 48 Wis., 567; Kingsley v. Supervisors, 49 Wis., 649; and Single v. Stettin, id., 645, and must be reversed.

This is perhaps a proper place to remark that the opinion of the court in Kingsley v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flanders v. Town of MerrimackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  2. In re PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Plumer v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Kingsley v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Southmayd v. Watertown Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sloane v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Gilbert-Arnold Land Co. v. O'HareWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Johnston v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Voelz v. VoelzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Clarke v. Lincoln CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API