Stylow v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.
The first question upon this appeal is whether the jury’s verdict is sustained by the evidence. This requires a brief review of the facts.
The accident occurred on February 25, 1939, at 11:40 p. m. Plaintiff was driving his car north on Sixty-Third street in the city of Milwaukee. Defendant’s bus was proceéding east on National avenue. The intersection of Sixty-Third street and National avenue forms a “T” or closed intersection. Sixty-Third street does not continue north of National avenue. Plaintiff, according to testimony which the jury was entitled to believe, stopped at National avenue,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Biersach v. WechselbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Grasser v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Hansen v. StorandtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Will v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Hobbs v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCauley v. International Trading Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Haase v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Scipior v. SheaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Fleischhacker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Julio Diniero v. United States Lines CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.