Legal Opinion

Stylow v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The first question upon this appeal is whether the jury’s verdict is sustained by the evidence. This requires a brief review of the facts.

The accident occurred on February 25, 1939, at 11:40 p. m. Plaintiff was driving his car north on Sixty-Third street in the city of Milwaukee. Defendant’s bus was proceéding east on National avenue. The intersection of Sixty-Third street and National avenue forms a “T” or closed intersection. Sixty-Third street does not continue north of National avenue. Plaintiff, according to testimony which the jury was entitled to believe, stopped at National avenue,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Biersach v. WechselbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Grasser v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hansen v. StorandtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Will v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Hobbs v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McCauley v. International Trading Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Haase v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Scipior v. SheaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Fleischhacker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Julio Diniero v. United States Lines CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API