Legal Opinion
Cole v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 24, 1941No. Appeal, 72PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
This is an appeal by complainants from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission which was to the effect that it was unlawful for the Latrobe Water Company to continue to serve unfiltered water to the public, including complainants, and that it was unreasonable to require the company to serve filtered water to complainants and certain others who indicated their desire for water service. The commission dismissed the complaint.
The Borough of Latrobe, in Westmoreland County, lies between Derry Township on the east and southeast, and Unity Township on the north,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moderm Trans. Co. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Com.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Bly v. White Deer Mountain Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Modern Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- John Benkart & Sons Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Shenandoah Suburban Bus Lines, Inc., CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Horn's Motor Express, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Leaman Transportation Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- United Natural Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.