Legal Opinion

Moore v. Schofield

California Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1892No. 14810PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sierra County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

— This appeal is upon the judgment roll, which, however, includes a hill of exceptions, settled at the time the decision was ■ made, under section 649 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 1

The action was brought to recover eight thousand four hundred dollars, alleged to be due from the defendants upon a contract made by them with plaintiff, whereby they agreed to purchase certain shares of stock in a mining corporation, upon terms agreed upon.

There was also a cause of action set up for moneys laid out and expended for the use of defendants.

*487It was therefore a suit founded upon an alleged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knight v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Myers v. ReinsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Blood v. FairbanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Sedgwick v. SedgwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Chase v. EvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stuart v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Estate of EmersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hendricks v. HendricksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Rice v. RigleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Deacon v. BryansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API