Hardy v. Weitzman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment for the defendants entered upon a jury’s verdict. The plaintiff Hilda M. Hardy claims to have fallen and sustained injuries because of the defendants’ negligence in placing and maintaining a mat outside the doorway of the defendant Benjamin Weitzman’s store, which is located in a building owned by the defendant Fay Weitzman. The defendants denied that they were negligent and in a special defense alleged that Hilda was chargeable with contributory negligence. The plaintiffs claimed that Hilda tripped over the upturned corner of the mat and that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Meglio v. ComeauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Crowell v. Middletown Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Messier v. ZanglisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Hasler v. T. H. Canty & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Foster v. Hartford Buick Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
3Cited by9 opinions
- Harry A. Finman & Son, Inc. v. Connecticut Truck & Trailer Service Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Royal Homes, Inc. v. Dalene Hardwood Flooring Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Bredouw v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Hanken v. Buckley Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Goodman v. Metallic Ladder Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.