Legal Opinion

The Willowdene

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1899No. 30PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Admiralty. Appeal from the taxation of costs. '

1Opinion of the Court

McPHERSON, District Judge.

Several objections were taken to the clerk’s taxation, but only two were insisted upon at the argument - — First, because he disallowed so much of the cost of printing the record as exceeded the sum of 75 cents per page, this being the customary price in the district; and, second, because he refused to allow an item of $220, which was paid by the claimant to the surety company that joined in the stipulation.

I think the first objection has a fair ground of support. The cost *510of printing is charged at $1 per page, and the clerk was right in refusing to allow it without…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The South PortlandDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Williams v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. The TexasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  4. The Walter AdamsDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1921
  5. R. H. Beaumont Co. v. National Sand & Gravel Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API