Legal Opinion
Gibbs v. Babbitt
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided December 21, 1998No. 4:97-cv-00041PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOYLE, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on three motions for summary judgment: one each from the Plaintiffs, Federal Defendants, and Defendant-Intervenors. The underlying action, in its present form, is for relief from alleged violations of the Constitution, and especially the Tenth Amendment, by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”). Plaintiffs seek various forms of relief, including a declaration that all federal regulations relating to the taking of red wolves on private land are invalid, a declaration of the primacy of North Carolina laws regarding the red…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Regina Rene DinwiddieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gibbs v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Red Wolf Coalition v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Gibbs v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Gibbs v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Red Wolf Coalition v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021