Legal Opinion
Carter v. 73 Cranberry Street, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 31, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants 73 Cranberry Street, Inc., and John S. Ansted appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated August 20, 2004, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the appellants is granted,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hausser v. GiuntaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Jandru Mats, Inc. v. Riteway AV Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Ivanyushkina v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Tate v. Freeport Union School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Devine v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bradley v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Reich v. MeltzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Irizarry v. Rose Bloch 107 University Place PartnershipNew York Supreme Court · 2006