Legal Opinion

Ivanyushkina v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 2002PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated September 28, 2001, as granted those branches of the separate motions of the defendants Bashar Dumar and Ilham P. Dumar and the defendants Rae Scotto and Leonard Frances Scotto for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

An…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hausser v. GiuntaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Kaufman v. SilverNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Winberry v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Ritts v. TeslenkoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Benenati v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Katz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Adorno v. CartyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Reich v. MeltzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Rodriguez v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Zektser v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API