Legal Opinion

Hammond v. State Roads Commission

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 3, 1966No. [No. 177, September Term, 1965.]PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.

This appeal from an order denying interest on a condemnation award is based on the claim that the action of the lower court deprived the condemnees of a part of the just compensation to which they were entitled under the provisions of the Constitution of Maryland.

The appellee-condemnor is the State Roads Commission of Maryland .(S.R.C.). The appellants-condemnees are the property owners whose land was needed by the State for highway purposes. The condemnor took possession of the property under the authority granted by § 40B of Article III of the Constitution 1 and §§ 9-18 of Article 89B of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. Alcea Band of TillamooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. General Electric Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  5. Wolf v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. King v. State Roads Commission of the State Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Walker v. Acting DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Rochester Carting Co. v. LevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Lore v. Board of Public WorksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Mayor of Baltimore v. Kelso Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API