Legal Opinion
Lore v. Board of Public Works
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 7, 1976No. [No. 130, September Term, 1975.]PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.
Murphy, C. J., dissents and filed a dissenting opinion at page 361 infra.
In this case we are called upon to decide whether landowners whose property is taken through the exercise of the State’s power of eminent domain are entitled to interest on the compensatory award, to be computed from the date of the entry of the judgment nisi on the inquisition to the time of payment. We conclude that they are.
The relevant facts are not in dispute and may be related in but one paragraph. G. I. Rupert Lore and Dora D. Lore, the petitioners, owned 92 acres of land located near the St. Mary’s River in St.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State Roads Commission v. WarrinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Riden v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington R. R.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Earle v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Reichs Ford Road Joint Venture v. State Roads Commission of the State Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- City of Baltimore Development Corporation v. Carmel Realty AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- King v. State Roads Commission of the State Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Poudre Valley Rural Electric Ass'n v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Reichs Ford Road Joint Venture v. State Roads Comm'n of the State Highway Admin.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.