King v. State Roads Commission of the State Highway Administration
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Chief Judge.
The primary issue in this “quick-take” condemnation case is whether the constitutional requirement that the State pay “just compensation” for private property taken for public use includes, as an integral part thereof, interest at the prevailing market rate from the time possession of the property is taken to the time of payment of the condemnation award.
I
Both the Fifth Amendment to the Federal Constitution and Article III, § 40 of the Constitution of Maryland prohibit the taking of private property for public use without the payment of just compensation to the property…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. ArmacostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Redevelopment Agency v. GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- J.L. Matthews, Inc. v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Scholz v. S.B. International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Serio v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.