Wesley v. Allen
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry
Appellant sued appellee for malpractice. He charged negligence in general terms but failed to aver due care on his part or such a state of facts and circumstances from which due care could be reasonably inferred. A demurrer to the declaration was interposed and sustained. By leave of court appellant filed an amended declaration in which he averred that he received an injury whereby the flesh was crushed and torn from the first joint of the forefinger of his right hand; that appellee was employed and undertook to treat said injury; that the proper treatment therefor was to amputate a part of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Walters v. City of OttawaIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Ross v. Erickson Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Viita v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Carlin v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Parkell v. FitzporterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lawrence v. WirthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- Hanson v. NortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Rasgaitis v. RasgaitisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
- Brady v. McNamaraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Huntoon v. PritchardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.