Legal Opinion

Stockhausen v. Oehler

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

The sole question presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting a new trial. “This court is very loath to interfere with the discretion to grant new trials that is vested in circuit judges. It is a power that should be courageously and fearlessly exercised whenever a trial judge is convinced that to enter judgment on a verdict returned would result in a miscarriage of justice. It is very possible that this important power is used more sparingly than it should be. However this may be, it is only in a clear case of an abuse of discretion that this court will interfere.”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCoy v. TerhorstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Schlag v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. EggertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Werren v. Allied American Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Nowicki v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Popko v. Globe Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API