Popko v. Globe Indemnity Co.

Appellants contend that in any event they are entitled to judgment dismissing the complaint of Federal Union Insurance Company because a new trial was not granted it by the language of the trial court. With this we do not agree. The court referred to only one cause in its opinion, but the reasoning applied to both; the omission was obviously oversight on the part of the trial court because the two cases were consolidated. The order applies with equal force to both cases.

It is next contended that the verdict is not contrary to the great weight of the evidence and that the trial court abused…