Legal Opinion
Jacobs, Visconsi & Jacobs Co. v. City of Lawrence
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 6, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-2249-SPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss each and all counts of plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In the alternative, defendants move the court to strike the complaint. Also, defendants move the court to abstain from exercising jurisdiction. Plaintiffs Richard A. Armstrong and Betty J. Gris-ham are property owners in the City of Lawrence, Kansas. Plaintiff Jacobs, Vis-consi & Jacobs Company (“JVJ”) holds an option on these properties. This lawsuit arises out of the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jacobs, Visconsi & Jacobs, Co. v. City of LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Flood v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- Continental Coal, Inc. v. CunninghamDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Classic Communications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.