Legal Opinion
Continental Coal, Inc. v. Cunningham
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 2, 2007No. Civil Action 06-2122-KHVPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
On April 3, 2006, Continental Coal, Inc. (“Continental”) filed suit against Matt and Laura Cunningham and the Board of County Commissioners of Linn County, Kansas (“Board”). Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Continental alleges that by attempting to modify the hours of operation of a conditional use permit for it to mine coal on certain property in Linn County, Kansas, defendants violated Continental’s rights to procedural due process and equal protection under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Continental also asserts…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Kansas Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- De Leon v. MarcosDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010
- CONTINENTAL COAL, INC. v. CunninghamDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Barker v. Utah Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
- Cohon Ex Rel. Bass v. New Mexico Department of HealthDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.