Legal Opinion

Moore v. Ramsey & Legwen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 18, 1915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Trover. Before Judge Hammond. Columbia superior court. February SO, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. An action of trover was instituted to recover described personal property. In her answer the defendant alleged that “she is the owner” of the property and ’’refuses to deliver” it to the plaintiffs. On the trial there was no evidence that the plaintiffs had made a demand upon the defendant for the property, or that she had refused to deliver. Reid, that, the defendant having alleged in her answer that she was owner and admitted that she refused to deliver the property to the plaintiffs, it was not incumbent upon them to prove a demand and a refusal of the defendant to deliver. Muse v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grant v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Muse v. Wright & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Commercial Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  2. Carter v. American Slicing Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  3. Collins v. HiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Whelchel v. RoarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Earle v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API