Muse v. Wright & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Trover — certiorari. Before Judge Felton. Bibb superior •court. April term, 1897.
1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.
Wright & Co. sold a horse to Muse, taking his promissory note for the purchase-money. They reserved •title.in-themselves until the note should be fully paid. Muse made a payment upon the note, but refused to pay the balance; •and Wright & Co. began an action of trover in a justice’s court for the recovery of the horse. The sole defense of the defendant in the trial of the case in that court was, a partial failure of ■consideration. The jury found in plaintiff’s favor, and the defendant sued out a writ of certiorari. This was overruled by *784the superior court. In this writ the point is for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith & Co. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Shoemaker, Miller & Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Gottlieb v. HartmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1876
- Cranz v. KrogerIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tanner-Brice Co. v. BarrsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Securities Trust Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Grant v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Smith v. Commercial Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Dasher v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.