Legal Opinion

Muse v. Wright & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 25, 1898PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Trover — certiorari. Before Judge Felton. Bibb superior •court. April term, 1897.

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

Wright & Co. sold a horse to Muse, taking his promissory note for the purchase-money. They reserved •title.in-themselves until the note should be fully paid. Muse made a payment upon the note, but refused to pay the balance; •and Wright & Co. began an action of trover in a justice’s court for the recovery of the horse. The sole defense of the defendant in the trial of the case in that court was, a partial failure of ■consideration. The jury found in plaintiff’s favor, and the defendant sued out a writ of certiorari. This was overruled by *784the superior court. In this writ the point is for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith & Co. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Shoemaker, Miller & Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. Gottlieb v. HartmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1876
  4. Cranz v. KrogerIllinois Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tanner-Brice Co. v. BarrsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  2. Securities Trust Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Grant v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Smith v. Commercial Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  5. Dasher v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API