Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Skinner

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 2012No. 1110354PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STUART, Justice.

David Bennett and Bennett & Bennett Construction, Inc. (hereinafter referred to collectively as “Bennett”), appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration of the claims alleging fraud in the inducement and the tort of outrage brought against them by Barbara and Leotes Skinner. We reverse and remand.

Facts

The Skinners entered into a construction-services contract with Bennett, pursuant to which Bennett was to renovate and remodel their residence located in Oxford. The contract contained an arbitration clause, which provided:

“Any and all claims, disputes…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McBro Planning and Development Company and McCarthy Brothers Company, a Joint Venture v. Triangle Electrical Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Quality Truck and Auto Sales, Inc. v. YassineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Allsopp v. Bolding, 1100432 (Ala. 9-30-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  4. Beaver Const. Co. v. Lakehouse, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Harold Allen's Mobile Home Factory Outlet, Inc. v. EarlySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Regions Bank v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  2. Quantum Research International Inc v. SPG Institute IncDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API