Legal Opinion
Allsopp v. Bolding, 1100432 (Ala. 9-30-2011)
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 30, 2011No. 1100432PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOLIN, Justice.
Timothy C. Allsopp appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Rule 60(b)(4), Ala. *954R. Civ. P., motion for relief from a judgment entered in favor of James A. Bolding and Kisha Bolding.
Specifically, Allsopp contends that the judgment is void because⅛ he argues, he was not properly served with notice.
Facts and Procedural History
On January 31, 2008, the Boldings sued Naysa Realty and Investments, LLC, De-leana Davis, Keller-Williams Realty Co., and Allsopp. The Boldings alleged breach of fiduciary duty, and three counts of fraud, arising out of real-estate transactions in Madison…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Panavision International, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership v. Dennis Toeppen Network Solutions, Inc., a District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Boshell v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- P.B. Surf, Ltd. v. SavageSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- Pizzato v. Alabama Educational Television CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- Victor Deng and DM Technology & Energy, Inc. v. Clarence "Buddy" Scoggins and Complete Lighting Source, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- Jewel Campbell v. Ethel C. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- Wehle v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.