Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. Alonso

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1980No. 10537PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*665OPINION

By the Court,

Manoukian, J.:

In this appeal and cross-appeal from a judgment in favor of appellant, we recognize two issues as having merit. They are: (1) Whether the damages awarded were inadequate as a matter of law; and (2) Whether the trial court erred in awarding attorney’s fees to appellant.

In 1972, appellant Sanchez, John Sankovich and Art Fife formed a partnership called Esquire Properties. Sanchez acquired Fife’s interest two years later. Dr. Edwards joined the partnership in 1974 as a limited partner. Each of the three partners owned a one-third interest although Dr. Edwards…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. K & S Oil Well Service, Inc. v. Cabot Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Paradise Homes, Inc. v. Central Surety and Ins. Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Levin v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Jones v. ChildsNevada Supreme Court · 1872
  5. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. FarnowNevada Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aliya Medcare Finance, LLC v. NickellDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. Transaero Land & Development Co. v. Land Title of Nevada, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hamlin v. Transcon LinesWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Hamlin v. Transcon LinesWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Turkiye Ihracat Kredi Bankasi, A.S. v. Nature's Bakery, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API