Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hamlin v. Transcon Lines

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1985No. 83-221, 83-222Published

1DissentBrown, Justice

I dissented in part to the court’s original opinion. My principal disagreement with the majority at this juncture is the manner in which it has disposed of the state’s petition for rehearing.

I

Ordinarily a petition for rehearing is disposed of in a short, simple order, unless, of course, there is something wrong with the opinion. In this case, however, the majority vehemently maintains that there is nothing wrong with the opinion, but then uses more words than contained in the original opinion to explain why there is nothing wrong with it. The majority is originating a most peculiar procedure.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alberts v. American Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. v. DavilaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Trapp v. R-Vec Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Esso Standard Oil Company v. KellyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Sanchez v. AlonsoNevada Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API