Legal Opinion
New Elliott Corp. v. MAN GUTEHOFFNUNGSHÜTTE AG
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 15, 1997No. 97 Civ. 1707 (JSR)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
RAKOFF, District Judge.
While parties may contract for an arbitrator to decide their disputes without requiring him to give any reasons for his decisions, the instant controversy requires the Court to determine what is required when the contract instead calls for the arbitrator to provide written findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Specifically, the parties here, who were part of an international joint venture, were among the signatories to a Shareholders’ Agreement dated December 13, 1989, that provided that disputes that might arise relating to that Agreement would be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Jack BobkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,563 Western Employers Ins. Co. v. Jefferies & Co., Inc., & Warren NadelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Martin A. Armstrong v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- Daniel v. Green v. Ameritech Corporation and Ameritech Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- REMOTE SOLUTION CO., LTD. v. FGH Liquidating Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Green v. Ameritech CorpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Twin Falls NSC, LLC v. Southern Idaho Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLCDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2019