Legal Opinion
REMOTE SOLUTION CO., LTD. v. FGH Liquidating Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 31, 2008No. Civ. 06-004-SLRPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On July 11, 2003, Contec Corporation (“Contec”) 1 filed a demand for arbitration against Remote Solution Co., Ltd. (“RSC”), a Korean entity, with the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”), claiming several breaches of the parties’ 1999 Manufacturing and Purchase Agreement (“MPA”). The parties agreed to bifurcate the issues of liability and damages for purposes of arbitration. The Arbitrator issued his rulings on liability on July 26, 2005 and on damages on December 26, 2005. This matter is before the court on RSC’s motion to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hooper Associates Ltd. v. AGS Computers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Daniel v. Green v. Ameritech Corporation and Ameritech Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- General Atomic Co. v. United Nuclear Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Remote Solution Co. v. FGH Liquidating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Remote Solution Co. v. FGH Liquidating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009