Legal Opinion

Johns v. Wilson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1898No. Civil No. 621PublishedCited by 10 opinions

ERROR to the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. A. C. Baker, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDoan, J.

On the twenty-fourth day of April, 1893, one John S. Armstrong executed a mortgage on certain real es*128tate to James Wilson, to secure the payment of two notes therein described, each for $3,250 and interest. Afterwards, on the eighteenth day of December, 1893, the said Armstrong sold the premises thus mortgaged to one R. E. Daggs, and conveyed the same by a deed of conveyance, in which the said defendant R. E. Daggs agreed and bound himself, his heirs, executors, and assigns, to pay or cause to be paid to the said Wilson the aforesaid notes and mortgage, under which sale and transfer the said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Willard v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Williams v. NaftzgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Brackett v. BanegasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Morey v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brightwell v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1992
  2. Williams v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Deming National Bank v. WalravenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. Lewis v. HornbackArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Tuttle v. JockmusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API