Legal Opinion

Matter of Ah Sing

California Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1909No. Crim. No. 1565PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Sheriff of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied for the reason that so far as we can see the complaint in the justice’s court, under which petitioner is in custody, clearly states a public offense under the laws of this state. In view of the statement in the petition for the writ to the effect that a difference of opinion exists among the courts of this state as to the right of a court on habeas corpus to determine the question whether a complaint in a court of limited or inferior jurisdiction states facts sufficient to constitute a public offense, it appears proper to say that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of RuefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Ex Parte GreenallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. In Re CulverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. In Re HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. In Re MacKay Ex Rel. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. In Re HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API