George v. Wamsley
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Butler District Oourt. Plaintiffs brought an action by attachment against defendants, Wamsley and Hartness, and caused The Butler County Bank to be served with process of garnishment. The garnishee answered, denying indebtedness to defendants, and denying that it held any property of defendants. Issue was joined upon this answer, and, upon the final hearing of the case, the garnishee was discharged. Plaintiffs appeal. The facts of the case appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
*1761. PARTNERmentofpartwiíhfirm Ms Fraud cm ¿redltors‘ *175I. The answer of the garnishee was made be*176fore a commissioner, and, in detail, states and explains the transactions by virtue of which plaintiffs claim x ^iat ^ *s liakle in this proceeding, and in effect denies indebtedness to defendants and liability as a garnishee. The plaintiffs filed a pleading controverting the answer of the garnishee, and showing facts whereon they base the claim of its liability in this proceeding. The pleadings of the parties need not be more particularly stated just now. The facts upon which the garnishee is sought…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Maquoketa v. WilleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- Scudder v. DelashmutSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
3Cited by7 opinions
- Goddard-Peck Grocery Co. v. McCuneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Smith v. Smith Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Erdman v. Trustees of the Eutaw Methodist Protestant ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
- First National Bank v. BrubakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Central Manufacturing Co. v. MontgomeryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.