Erdman v. Trustees of the Eutaw Methodist Protestant Church
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. (Ambler, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The following is the prayer directed by the Court to be included in the report of the case: Plaintiff’s J¡.th Prayer.—The plaintiff prays the Court to instruct the jury should it find from the evidence in this case that the defendant, Harry S. Erdman, on December 28th, 1910, signed and delivered, to the plaintiff the promissory note for $500 sued on in this case,…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. (Ambler, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The following is the prayer directed by the Court to be included in the report of the case: Plaintiff’s J¡.th Prayer.—The plaintiff prays the Court to instruct the jury should it find from the evidence in this case that the defendant, Harry S. Erdman, on December 28th, 1910, signed and delivered, to the plaintiff the promissory note for $500 sued on in this case, and should the jury further find that the said promissory note was given to. and accepted by the plaintiff in payment of…
1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.
This suit is brought by the plaintiff against the defendant, individually and as surviving partner of E. S. Erdman & Son, to recover on tbe following described promissory note:
“Baltimore, December 28, 1910.
Pour years after date I promise to pay to Trustees of Eutaw Methodist Protestant Church the sum of five hundred dollars ($500), with interest.
(Signed) E. S. Erdman & Son.
Endorsed: Interest paid April 1st, 1912, $30.00.”
The declaration, after declaring on the six common counts in assumpsit, by tbe seventh count alleges: And for that the defendant, Harry S. Erdman, and Erancis S. Erdman…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Commercial Bank of Buffalo v. . WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Locke v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Gansevoort v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Fletcher v. PullenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
- Powell v. MesserTexas Supreme Court · 1857
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pavel Enterprises, Inc. v. AS Johnson Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Wiggins v. Capital Transit CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Maryland National Bank v. United Jewish Appeal Federation of Greater Washington, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Roycroft v. NellisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Sterling v. Victor Cushwa & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.