Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Brubaker

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 19, 1905PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Warren District Gourt.— IIon. Edmund Nichols, Judge. Ti-ie opinion states the case.—

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

On or about March 1, 1902, the defendant O. D. Brubaker and one Alexander entered into partnership as retail merchants. Brubaker had very little capital, 'and his father and mother, who are co-defendants herein, advanced or loaned to him.about $1,800 with which to begin business. In August following the firm property was sold to Nuzom Bros. For some reason not clearly indicated, the partners did not unite in the deal with the purchasers, but conducted separate negotiations; Alexander selling his half or partnership interest to one of the Nuzoms, and Brubaker selling his interest.to the other,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Allen v. Center Valley Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1851
  2. Dimon v. . HazardNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  3. City of Maquoketa v. WilleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  4. Johnston & Son v. RobuckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Smith v. Smith Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Caldwell Backing & T. Co. v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Capital Food Co. v. Globe Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Howell v. HowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Mead v. City National Bank of ClintonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  5. Midland National Bank v. DouglasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API