Legal Opinion

Brunswick Corp. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 23, 1967PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals from an order of Erie Special Term which denied its motion to take depositions of insurance adjustors, a special arson agent, and insurance brokers in its action to recover, under á loss payable clause, the fire loss of its conditionally sold property wherein defendants had inter-

*183posed defenses of concealment, fraud, and arson by the insured to defeat plaintiff’s action. The adjustors, Bartholomew and Jones, and the arson agent Conway were shown to have been agents of defendants in their examination of the premises after the fire. Plaintiff, therefore, had the right under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doheny v. . LacyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Montgomery Ward Co. v. City of LockportNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Hayward v. Willard Mountain, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ritrovato v. Hartford Insurance GroupNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  2. E. B. Metal Industries v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API