Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. Clay
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Chief Judge.
The question raised on a motion for a directed verdict is whether there is sufficient evidence to go to the jury. The directed verdict motion replaced the former procedural device of a motion for involuntary nonsuit. The standard to be applied in determining whether a motion for directed verdict should be granted is essentially the same, however, as the standard formerly applied in ruling on a motion for nonsuit. Investment Properties v. Allen, 281 N.C. 174, 188 S.E. 2d 441 (1972). “To determine the sufficiency of the evidence to go to the jury, all evidence sup porting the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Oliver Ex Rel. Oliver v. RoyallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Dixon Ex Rel. Dixon v. LillySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Mitchell v. Guilford County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wallace Ex Rel. Magers v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Zickgraf Hardwood Co. v. SeayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Lewis ex rel. Lewis v. DoveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Deep Run Milling Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Goodman v. N.C. Department of CorrectionNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2011