Legal Opinion

Sagar v. Sagar

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 14, 2003No. 02-P-89PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrasso, J.

In the course of contentious divorce proceedings between two devout Hindus, the husband moved the court for permission to perform a Hindu religious ritual, Chudakarana,1 upon the parties’ young daughter. After a hearing, a Probate Court judge ordered that, “The religious ceremony known as *72Chudakarana shall not be performed on the minor child, until the child is of sufficient age to make that determination herself, absent a written agreement between the parties.” On appeal from a divorce decree incorporating this order, the father maintains that the order violates his right to free exercise of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. BallardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Blixt v. BlixtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Attorney General v. DesiletsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cloutier v. Costco WholesaleDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  2. O'Connell v. GreenwoodMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  3. Falconi v. Secretary of StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Sagar v. Middlesex Division of the Probate & Family Court Department of the Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  5. Care and Protection of Eve.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API