State v. Candedo
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
McHUGH, Judge:
¶ 1 Francisco A. Candedo appeals his conviction for one count each of Securities Fraud, a second degree felony, see Utah Code Ann. §§ 61-1-1, -21 (2006), and Sales by an Unlicensed Agent and Employing an Unlicensed Agent, both third degree felonies, see id. §§ 61-1-3, -21 (2006). 1 Candedo argues that this court should reverse because either (1) the trial court may not impose consecutive terms of probation under the Utah Code of Criminal Procedure, see Utah Code Ann. § 77-18-l(10)(a)(i) (Supp.2007), or (2) section 77-18-l(10)(a)(i), as interpreted by State v.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. LopezUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Peterson v. the Sunrider Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CandedoUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KozlovCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Provo City v. IvieCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
- State v. KozlovCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012